-2- Roger Pielke, Jr. Thank you for your response. I'm not biyung Dr. Flannery's revisionist "what I meant to say" spin. It is clear from both quotes above that he was specifically addressing global temperatures and not CO2 levels. There is just no possible way for a scientists involved with the climate issue as long as he has been, to conflate the two.I understand that in viewing the forest rather than just the tree, Dr. Flannery's ill advised comments change nothing. The fact that Dr. Flannery screwed up only makes your advice on a new approach more poignant and likely imperative if they are to salvage the policy.
